Author: Andreas Ardy Hendrayanto

51-inch: Samsung PN51F5500

Posted on Updated on


Amazon has lowered its price on this 3-D plasma TV by 41%. Its excellent smart TV package and great picture quality (in all but the brightest rooms) make this Samsung a good buy, Katzmaier says. It comes with two pairs of 3-D glasses, voice interaction, a touch pad remote, and multiple connectivity options including Wi-Fi, Ethernet and Bluetooth.

$797.99 at See current price.


47-inch: Vizio E470i-A0

Posted on Updated on


This HDTV series comes in a range of sizes, and Katzmaier says that they all are great bargains considering the level of picture quality they deliver. Although this Vizio smart TV is missing sports apps such as MLB.TV, it has a good selection of on-demand services and social media including Netflix, Vudu, Skype, Facebook and Pandora. For a similar-sized TV at a much lower price, the 42-inch Sharp LC-42LB150U is on sale at Best Buy for $399.99. However, this TV doesn’t have the smart features that the Vizio does.

$578 on See current price.


32-inch: Samsung UN32F5500

Posted on Updated on


This is one of the best 32-inch HDTVs at this price level for several reasons, says Katzmaier, who developed CNET’s TV test procedure. It offers solid picture quality and has a higher display resolution than many of the cheaper models (1080p versus 720p). This LED model also has Samsung’s Smart TV suite, whereas the similar but cheaper UNF5000 series does not. The “smart” designation means that it has built-in Wi-Fi and allows access to on-demand video streaming from services such as Netflix as well as access to social media, music and more. senior editor Louis Ramirez says that 32-inch TVs generally don’t come with as many features as this model. Even better, he says, it has three HDMI ports, which means you can connect more components to it, whereas cheaper TVs in this size category typically have only two HDMI ports. The current Amazon sale price is about 40% lower than its list price of $579.

$347.99, on See current price.


A list of every Xbox One and Xbox 360 game launching this month

Posted on Updated on


Console wars aside, gamers are in for a good year regardless of which home video game console they choose to purchase. We’ve already taken a look at the new titles headed to Sony’s PlayStation 4 and other PlayStation consoles this month, and now it’s time to shift focus over to Microsoft’s Xbox One and the previous-generation Xbox 360, which is still going strong. February is going to be a great month for Xbox fans with four titles debuting for the Xbox One including the highly anticipated “Thief” and a new Lego game, along with 10 new Xbox 360 games.

The full list of upcoming February releases for both consoles, which was compiled by IGN, follows below.

Xbox One

Xbox 360


The biggest problem Apple is running into with its iWatch

Posted on Updated on


Battery life is a big issue that wearable devices must overcome, and Apple has apparently considered several different possibilities in its effort to improve battery performance on its rumored upcoming iWatch smartwatch, The New York Times reports.

The company has been testing a method to charge the iWatch wirelessly via magnetic induction, a person who was briefed on the product said. Furthermore, Apple may place a solar-charging layer on top of the iWatch’s curved screen to help out with battery charging when worn in daylight. Finally, a different effort involves charging a battery by movement – specifically, the natural swinging of the wearer’s arm while walking could generate energy for the device.

However, it’s not clear what charging method the iWatch will employ aside from regular battery charging means, or whether a combination of methods will be used to prolong the battery life of a wearable device that wouldn’t otherwise have room for a bigger battery.

With other devices, Apple has been able to extend battery life by optimizing software and by using less power-hungry chips. At the same time, Apple has patented different techniques that would help it draw more power for devices, including solar or movement charging.

Solar charging has apparently been on Apple’s mind for a long while, the Times reports, especially for mobile devices, although the technology has not been put to use yet. Tony Fadell, Apple’s former vice president whose new company has been recently acquired by Google, says that adding solar charging abilities to iPhones and iPads did not prove practical, “because mobile devices often stay inside pockets when people are outdoors, and indoor artificial light generates only a tiny amount of energy.

Recent reports revealed that Apple has already met with FDA officials to purportedly discuss the iWatch, and that Apple’s upcoming iOS 8 mobile operating system will have health as a “headline features,” with the iWatch expected to work closely with iPhones to deliver health- and fitness-related tracking features.


Apple’s ‘next big thing’ might be even bigger than we thought

Posted on Updated on


The iWatch may cost $299 when it launches later this year, Morgan Stanley analyst Katy Huberty said in a note to investors on Tuesday (via CNET), a price that’s exactly what Samsung initially charged for its first-generation Galaxy Gear and similar to the Pebble’s second smartwatch, the Pebble Steel. However, the iWatch is expected to be even more popular than its competitors’ offerings and it may indeed me the “next big thing” for Apple.

“Our working assumption is that iWatch largely will be adopted as an accessory device and, therefore, sold into the existing customer base, like the iPad, rather than to new customers, like the iPod or iPhone,” Huberty wrote.

Huberty further noted that the iWatch could become a significant revenue stream for Apple, bringing in as much as $17.5 billion in the first year – at $299 each, that would mean Apple would have to sell well over 58 million units during the period. At the same time, the analyst said that due to potential component constraints, Apple may only generate from $12 billion to $14 billion in revenue in its first year of selling the iWatch.

In case such a scenario would play out, the iWatch would be more successful in its first year than the iPad’s and iPhone’s first years combined. The iPad generated $12 billion in sales in its first year, while the first-gen iPhone brought in $2.5 billion in revenue.